🔗
LYNQYO - Whitepaper
  • 💡Project explained
    • 🔍Lynqyo Overview
      • Content economy: challange and potential
      • Creator: web3 protocols, applications and tools for a decentralized content-led economy
  • 👨‍💻User system
    • Web3 gateway: lynq.yo/ ‘links’
    • Creator⇋fan: ecosystem pipe
    • Creator: system⇔journey
    • Fan: system⇔journey
  • 🛡️Lynqyo Content Economy Protocol
    • Structure
    • Creating value: tokenized intangible content
    • DAO: governance of tokenized intangible content
      • Quadratic voting
  • 🪙The token
    • Lynqyo token: $LNQ
    • Functionality
    • Intrinsic challenges
    • Technical approach
    • Automated Royalty Distribution
    • Protection
  • 🚧Product architecture
    • Approach
    • Web3 portal for tokenized content: CUBE
    • Subscription payments and lending: creator DeFi
    • Thrust subscriptions: dAPP
  • 📊Tokeomics: Ecosystem, Applications and Associations
    • Balanced approach
    • Transactions
    • User Engagement Rewards: Creator+Fan
    • User engagement rewards: the how
    • Flow controls: auto-management
    • Flow controls: principle equation
    • Token allocations
  • 🛣️Roadmap
    • Stage 1: 2022
    • Stage 2: 2023
    • Stage 3: 2024
  • 📲Connect with us
    • Social media links
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Lynqyo Content Economy Protocol
  2. DAO: governance of tokenized intangible content

Quadratic voting

An important concept to note for Lynqyo-Ecosystem DAO-governance is the concept of Voting Power. The concept of voting power is not new however (also known as quadratic voting) and it has been written about extensively. You can find a link to an article on quadratic voting written by Vitalik Buterin here.

For the DAO, Voting Power is determined by taking the square root of a user’s Ethereum-mainnet $LNQ holdings (in wallet and staked) at a specified "block" per proposal. This block is usually set to be at, or just before the time the proposal goes live.

What does it look like in practice? In short, your n’th unit of voting power costs you $n. For example, your first vote costs you 1 $LNQ, your second 2 $LNQ, your third 3 $LNQ, etc. The effect hereof is immediate, those with large token holdings are adversely affected by this mechanism. What makes this desirable is the fact that it encourages smaller token holders to voice their opinion and makes it much more difficult for large token holders to organize and push through proposals that are not desired.

PreviousDAO: governance of tokenized intangible contentNextThe token

Last updated 2 years ago

🛡️